[LHN]

Evidence grading method

LHN separates evidence type from claim strength. A human RCT can still be too small or too indirect for a broad longevity claim, and a mechanism can be important without proving a consumer outcome.

Evidence:Human trial evidence

Human Rct

Controlled human trial evidence. We still check sample size, endpoints, population and replication.

Evidence:Human observational evidence

Human Observational

Human association data. Useful for signals, weaker for causal claims.

Evidence:Trial registered

Clinical Trial Registered

A trial exists or is registered. Registration is not proof of benefit.

Evidence:Mostly lab/animal

Animal Preclinical

Animal evidence. Important for biology, not enough for human consumer claims by itself.

Evidence:Early theory

Mechanism Only

Mechanistic plausibility without direct human outcome evidence.

Evidence:Mostly anecdotes

Anecdotal Social

User reports or forum discussion. Useful as demand signal, not evidence of efficacy.

Evidence:Regulatory watch

Regulatory Signal

Agency action, label, warning, meeting or registry signal.

Evidence:Commercial claim

Commercial Claim

A product, clinic or marketing claim that needs independent verification.

Evidence:Evidence unclear

Unknown

Insufficient source clarity to classify confidently.